|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmosis | 712 | Allocate 7m OSMO to the OGP Multisig to Fund Market Making Operations for 12 Months | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 711 | Osmosis Grants Program v3 Renewal | Link | Abstain | We strongly support Osmosis Grants Program. That's why we are part of the multisig. However, because we have a conflict of interest as a multisig member, we abstain from the vote. |
| Osmosis | 710 | ProtoRev usage: OSMO revenue as Burn Mechanism | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 709 | ProtoRev usage: Send non-OSMO revenue to Community Pool | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Nolus | 67 | Set up a DEX for the Neutron Leaser | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Nolus | 68 | Set up a DEX for the Neutron Profit | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Akash | 244 | 2024 Q1 Akash Events Resourcing Proposal | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| CosmosHub | 870 | 💎ATOM Airdrop ✅ 2024 New Version! ⭐ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| Fetch | 25 | Municipal Inflation (v0.11.3) | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Juno | 331 | Shift focus from feature upgrades to finishing dApps and dev onboarding | Link | No | The proposal has vaguely defined terms. What exactly are features? What are dApps? The proposal would have more credibility if it comes from a developer who works on Juno himself/herself. As it stands now, we believe such proposals do more harm than good for Juno. |