|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmosis | 533 | Supercharged Incentives Model | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| CosmosHub | 801 | Signalling Proposal - Gravity Dex Liquidity Module Removal | Link | Yes | It makes sense to remove the dead code because Gravity Dex is not coming back. |
| Osmosis | 531 | Reset Community Pool allocation to 0 | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| CosmosHub | 799 | On-board the Stride blockchain for ICS | Link | Yes | We are excited to onboard Stride to ICS. |
| CosmosHub | 800 | Provide 450K ATOM to Stride’s stATOM liquidity pool | Link | Yes | We are excited to onboard Stride to ICS. It is a great welcome gift to align interest. |
| Gravity | 181 | Compensation to cosmos holders | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| Gravity | 180 | Fund development of auction module. | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 530 | Introduce a Protocol Taker Fee for Osmosis swaps | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 529 | Regular Incentive adjustment for 2023-06-12 | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 528 | Decide What's Shown on the Main Osmosis Website | Link | No | We believe that on-chain governance should not and cannot dictate what frontend looks like. First, the appeal of web3 is that we all share the same database (the public ledger) while developers can permissionly innovate on frontend. If one frontend does not meet the user needs, it will be competed away by a better frontend. When users have diverse UI preferences, multiple frontends will emerge to meet the user needs. Second, because frontend is hosted off-chain, there is no meaningful way to enforce the governance decision on dev teams. It is social consensus all the way down. Therefore, such abstract proposal less effective than voting on specific tokens to be added through governance to signal the social consensus to various frontend teams. |